Grant References2024-08-29T18:10:50-04:00

Grant References

Executives & Sr. Leaders

  • Stanley Crooke
    Founder, Chairman of the Board & CEO​
    • Sarah Glass
      Chief Operating Officer​
      • Julie Douville
        Executive Director ASO Discovery & Development ​
        • Konstantia
          Skourti-Stathaki
          Director ASO Design & Discovery
      • Laurence Mignon
        Executive Director Clinical Development
        • Cedrik Ngongang
          Sr. Director Medical Geneticist
      • Virginia Sankey
        Executive Director Finance
      • Megan Knutsen
        Director Foundation & Project Management
    • Amy Williford
      Sr. Director Communication & Donor Relations
    • Kim Butler
      Sr. Director Operations​
    • Joseph Gleeson
      [Consultant] Part-time CMO​

Board of Directors

NAME TITLE ORGANIZATION
Stanley Crooke, M.D., Ph.D. Chairman and CEO of the Board of Directors n-Lorem Foundation
Rosanne Crooke, Ph.D. VP, Cardiovascular Disease n-Lorem Foundation
Sarah Glass Chief Operating Officer n-Lorem Foundation
Lynne Parshall Retired COO of Ionis
Michael Hayden, M.D., Ph.D. Killam Professor and Ionis Board of Directors member University of British Columbia
Joseph Loscalzo, M.D., Ph.D. Head of the Department of Medicine and Physician-in-Chief,
Board of Directors member and Executive Committee member
Brigham & Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Ionis and UDN
Frank Bennett EVP & Chief Scientific Officer Ionis Pharmaceuticals
Frank Sasanowski, M.S., M.P.H., J.D. Director Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C.
Jason Wood Founder and CEO J. Wood Capital Advisors
Gene Yeo, MBA Professor, Dept. of Cellular and Molecular Medicine University of California San Diego
Amy McCooe Executive Director The Wolverine Foundation
Paul Compton Global Head of Corporate & Investment Bank and President of Barclays Bank PLC (BBPLC) Barclays Bank PLC (BBPLC)
Neil Shneider, M.D., Ph.D. Claire Tow Associate Professor of Motor Neuron Disorders
Director, The Eleanor and Lou Gehrig ALS Center
Columbia University – Vagelos College of Physicians and Surgeons
Department of Neurology and the Center for Motor Neuron Biology and Disease
Alan Lotvin, M.D CEO & Co-Founder Sequel Med Tech, LLC
Andrew Lo, PhD Professor, Director and Principle Investigator Laboratory for Financial Engineering (LFE)
MIT Sloan School of Management

Expert Review Committees and Organizations

Name Purpose​
Access to Treatment Committee (ATTC) To advise on whether a patient should be accepted for potential treatment.
Research Management Committee (RMC) To assure that the ASO and treatment and evaluation plan are optimal.
FDA To review each investigational new drug (IND) application and assure that the ASO and treatment plan meet standards.
Study Treatment and Assessment Review (STAR) To assure the treatment plan is optimal.
Investigational Review Board (IRB) Each medical institution has an independent review committee to assure ethical treatment of patients.
Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) To review all clinical safety data on a quarterly basis and determine whether safety profiles of the personalized ASOs are adequate.

US FDA Guidance for ASO Medicines
for Nano-rare Patients

Issued ASO Guidance​

  • Initial FDA guidance for ASO for patients with diseases caused by ultra-ultra-rare mutations: Jan. 4, 2021
  • Pre-clinical requirements: Detailed guidance April 2021
  • CMC guidance Dec 2021
  • Clinical guidance Dec 2021
  • FDA response to n-Lorem concept supportive​
  • n-Lorem posed questions that require policy decisions, but progress toward policies evident​
  • In the meantime, experience facilitating ASOs for individuals provides real-life guidance

Nano-rare: 1 to 30 Patients Worldwide

Significant Range in Time
from Symptom Onset to Diagnosis​

SCN2A Patient: Mutation in the SCN2A gene

Known to exist in only 9 patients worldwide

History

  • Hospitalized initially at one month
  • First seizure at eight months
    • hospice care at age 2 ​
  • 29​ hospitalizations at 9​ institutions​
  • More than 34​ different diagnoses​
  • Treated with as many as 12​ to 15​ drugs at a time, but today untreated

Current Phenotype

  • 13 years of age ​
  • Modest seizure activity​
  • Severe movement disorder​
  • Developmental delays​
  • GI issue

Diagnostic and Treatment Odyssey

  • Parents found and paid for an academic scientist to sequence patient​
  • Parents supported research to define the nature of the mutations and to demonstrate causality​
  • Many challenges in identifying an institution willing to consider an experimental treatment​
  • ASO treatment and evaluation

Quality Systems Established to Assure
the Best Outcomes and Max Learnings….​

Patient Empowerment Program Podcast

Crooke, S.T., et.al., 173 patients. medRxiv 2024

https://medrxiv.org/cgi/content/short/2024.08.05.24310862v1

Genotypic and phenotypic analysis of 173 patients with extremely rare pathogenic
mutations who applied for experimental antisense oligonucleotide treatment

Stanley T. Crooke, Tracy A Cole, Jeffrey B Carroll, Joseph G Gleeson, Laurence Mignon, Julie Douville, Wendy Chung, Jennifer Bain, Elizabeth M Berry-Kravis, Nelson Leung, Scott Demarest, Emily McCourt, Andy Watt, Berit Powers, Cedrik Ngongang

doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.08.05.24310862

Decades of Experience in
Creating and Advancing ASO Technology​

Integrated Safety Databases Provide the ​Foundation
for Experienced Clinical Decision-Making​

Leaders Across All Areas of Drug ​Discovery,
Development and Manufacturing​ Businesses Support
Treating Nano-rare Patients at n-Lorem​

Biotech/Pharma Companies

Genomic Sequencing​

Pre-clinical Toxicology CROs​

Manufacturing

Clinical Management

Sterile Fill Product

Access to Appropriately Characterized
Patients and Investigators​

Data Partners

n-Lorem Research and Development Process

Current Treatment Institutions​

  • Children’s Hospital Colorado​
  • Columbia University​
  • Mayo Clinic – FL​
  • Mayo Clinic – MN​
  • New York University​
  • Rady Children’s Hospital​
  • Rush University Medical Center

Pending Treatment Institutions

  • AdventHealth-Orlando
  • ​Baylor College of Medicine​
  • Boston Children’s Hospital​
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center​
  • Children’s Healthcare of Atlanta​
  • Cleveland Clinic​
  • Cook Children’s Medical Center​
  • Dell Medical School​
  • Hackensack Meridian Health​
  • Hawaii Pacific Neuroscience​
  • Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine​
  • Massachusetts General Hospital​
  • Medical College of Wisconsin​
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke​
  • Northwestern University​
  • Phoenix Children’s Hospital​
  • Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School​
  • Seattle Children’s Hospital​
  • St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital​
  • The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids)​
  • The University of Texas – Houston​
  • Thomas Jefferson​
  • University of California, San Diego​
  • University of Miami​
  • University of Michigan​
  • UT Southwestern​
  • Weill Cornell Medicine​

Current n-Lorem Process To Discover and Develop
Optimal RNase H1 ASOs for CNS Disease​

Screening Step Purpose​ Approximate Minimum Numbers of ASOs Evaluated​ Minimum Criteria​​
ASO design including in silico off-target assessment​ Exclude motifs associated with ASO structure, repeat sequences, cytotoxicity, pro-inflammatory effects and off targets​
Include attractive motifs​
Scan entire pre-mRNA​
Apply algorithms
All important attractive motifs included, unattractive excluded​
Primary ASO screen​ To identify optimal sites in target RNA for ASO and H-1 binding​ ˜500 >80% target reduction​
Dose response evaluation of multiple ASOs​ To select at least 20 ASOs for in vivo tolerability screening​ ˜50-75​ IC50 1umol (free uptake)​
In vitro off-target analysis​ To confirm selectivity of ASO for target RNA vs. any worrisome off-target​ As many as necessary​ ˜10-fold difference in IC50s for target RNA vs. off-target​
BJAB Assay​ To exclude activators of innate immunity​ ˜50-75​ Less than 2-fold increase in TNF-alpha at high ASO concentrations​
Single dose tolerability screening in rodents at high dose including histopathology of CNS​ To identify optimally tolerated lead ASOs​ 20 Exclude poorly tolerated candidate and include ASO with an optimal therapeutic index

AIF1                       GFAP
Microglia           Astrocytes​
Repeat dose GLP 3-month rodent toxicity​ To identify NOAEL and cell-types at risk​ 1-3​ An attractive therapeutic index with an acceptable NOAEL​
GMP Manufacturing​ Quality ASO drug substance​ 1 Pure, stable drug product ​
Sterile Fill and Finish​ Quality, stable and sterile ASO drug product ​ 1 Sterile vials for administration​

SCN2A Patient Demonstration of Benefit

Kuri Journey

Distribution of Submitted Cases​

SCN2A Treated Nano-rare Patient

  • First IT ASO dose nL-SCN2A-002 on 3/7 and second IT dose administered on 3/27 (20 days apart)​
  • Dose 3 on 5/22 (FDA CDER for dose escalation submitted on 4/19)​
  • No drug related AE or SAE​
  • Safety labs stable​
  • No seizures since 3/30 even in setting of upper respiratory viral infection ​
    • had 21-25 seizures/day x3 days during Coronavirus infection (3/7) requiring emergency rescue seizure medication​
    • Baseline seizure frequency 1-2/night ​
    • 3 lb. weight gain ​
  • 4/8 typed “my brain feels calmer” on separate occasions ​
  • Posted on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT06314490)​

SCN2A: Patient Seizures Before and After Treatment

Debilitating and Fatal Degenerative Disease Leaves
Little Hope for KIF1A Patients and Their Families​

Prior to treatment, Susannah’s symptoms were severe and progressive:​

  • Global development delays​
  • Severe seizures (>100/day) unresponsive to common anti-epileptic medications​
  • Progressive spasticity of the lower limbs​
  • Painful chronic peripheral neuropathy​
  • Frequent falls resulting in multiple bone fractures​
  • Severely impaired walking and required wheelchair for mobility​
  • Communication only through simple sentences with frequent pauses​
  • Vision loss​​​

KIF1A Patient: Clinical Improvements in
Multiple Domains, Including Seizures,
Falls, and Quality Of Life​

Clinical Evidence of Benefit Across Many Measures​
No ASO-related Adverse Events

KIF1A Patient: Substantial Improvements Reported
Across Many Quality-of-Life Measures​

Measure Baseline (before treatment)​​ Dose 1​ Dose 4 Dose 7
Alert and aware during the day​ Sometimes Sometimes Often Very Often
​Been in a good mood​ Sometimes Sometimes Often Very Often
Showed happiness through body language​ Often Often Very Often Very Often
Expressed discomfort with changes in routine​ Sometimes​ Sometimes Never Rarely
Showed signs of being anxious or agitated​ Often Often Sometimes Rarely
Enjoyed moving their bodies (walking, etc)​ Rarely Rarely Sometimes Often
Expressed their needs (hunger, thirst)​ Sometimes​ Sometimes Sometimes Very Often
Enjoyed the social experience of mealtimes​ Rarely Rarely Very Often Often
Enjoyed spending time outdoors​ Rarely Rarely Sometimes Sometimes
Had enough energy to participate in daily routines​ Sometimes Sometimes Sometimes Often
Smiled or brightened their facial expression​ Sometimes Often Often Very Often

KIF1A Patient: Significant Decrease in ​
Parent-Reported Pain Scores​

Clinical Evidence of Benefit Across Many Measures​
No ASO-related Adverse Events​

SAA Patient: Promising Evidence of Halting Amyloid ​
Progression Observed After Three Months of Treatment​

  • Stabilization observed across several markers of kidney function​
    Analyte Healthy Adult Values Baseline (before treatment) Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4
    eGFR (mL/min/1.73m2) 55 63 60 56 60
    Serum Albumin (g/dL) 3.5-5.0 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.3 4.0
    BUN (mg/dL) 8-24 21 19 17 21 16
    Serum Creatinine (mg/dL) 0.74-1.35 1.56 1.42 1.49 1.57 1.48
  • Patient with progressive renal disfunction, prior to treatment was losing eGFR at a rate of 5-7 mL/min/1.73m2/year​
  • No drug related serious adverse events or adverse events​

SAA Patient: Plasma SAA Levels at Baseline
(before) and During Treatment

Go to Top